I know this has already been discussed, but I found a forum where a picture of a Solider from the 41st Armoured Infantry Division brewing up with his USMC style camo on, and I read on a bit and it was quite an interesting read.

Rivalry at Normandy
U.S. Marines barred from the June 6, 1944 landings.By W. Thomas Smith Jr.
Sixty-years-ago, along a 60-mile stretch of France's Normandy coastline, a combined force of American, British, and Canadian soldiers began streaming ashore as German artillery, mortar, machine-gun, and rifle fire ripped into their ranks. The mission of the Allied force was to kick down the door of Nazi Germany's Fortress Europe, and then launch a drive toward the heart of Adolf Hitler's Third Reich.
Overseen by American Gen. Dwight D. "Ike" Eisenhower, the operation was — and remains to this day — the largest amphibious assault in history.
Since then, the question has often been raised as to why the U.S. Marine Corps did not play a leading role in the landings. After all, the Corps's raison d'être was amphibious warfare. Marines had been perfecting the art of the amphibious assault since the 1920's, and between 1942 and 1944, they had put their skills to practical use at places like Guadalcanal, Makin, Bougainville, and Tarawa, in the Pacific.
In the Atlantic, Marines had trained Army forces for seaborne landings prior to the North African campaign in 1942, and then made landings during the same. Marines trained Army forces for the Sicilian-Italian landings in 1943. Marine Corps amphibious experts were on Ike's staff. And most Normandy-bound Army units were in fact instructed by Marines prior to the 1944 invasion.
So why didn't U.S. Marines storm the French coast with their Army counterparts?
First, the Marine Corps was then — as it has always been — much smaller than the Army. During World War II, the Corps swelled to a force comprising six divisions, whereas the Army expanded to 89 divisions. The Corps' resources were stretched thin, and much of its efforts were focused on the fighting in the Pacific.
Second, a deep-seeded rivalry between the Army and Marines was in full bloom: Its origins stretching back to World War I; the defining period of the modern Marine Corps.
Following the 1918 Battle of Belleau Wood (France), in which Marines played a leading role, newspapers in the U.S. credited much of the success of the American Expeditionary Force to the Marines. This occurred at the expense of deserving Army units even when referring to actions in which Marines did not participate.
In one instance, a number of newspapers covering the fighting at the Marne River bridges at Chateau-Thierry (a few days prior to the Battle of Belleau Wood) published headlines that read "Germans stopped at Chateau-Thierry with help of God and a few Marines." The headlines contributed to the Corps' already legendary reputation, and the Army was justifiably incensed. The Germans in fact had been stopped at Chateau-Thierry by the U.S. Army's 7th machinegun battalion.
Army leaders — including Generals George C. Marshall, Eisenhower, and Omar N. Bradley — were determined not to be upstaged by Marines, again. Thus, when America entered World War II in late 1941, the Marine Corps was deliberately excluded from large-scale participation in the European theater. And when the largest amphibious operation in history was launched, it was for all intents and purposes an Army show.
In the wee hours of June 6, 1944, paratroopers from the American 82nd, 101st, and British 6th Airborne divisions began jumping over France. Hours later, the first assault waves of the initial 175,000-man seaborne force began hitting the Normandy beaches at the Bay of Seine. Five beaches comprised the landing areas: Sword, Juno, and Gold Beaches were struck by Lt. Gen. Miles Christopher Dempsey's Second British Army. Omaha and Utah Beaches were stormed by Gen. Bradley's First U.S. Army.
Between Omaha and Utah, 225 men of the U.S. 2nd Ranger Battalion were tasked with scaling the 100-foot cliffs of Pointe du Hoc. There, five 155-millimeter guns were emplaced in reinforced concrete bunkers. As such the position encompassed "the most dangerous battery in France." It had to be knocked out to protect the landings.
When the Rangers began suffering heavy losses, brief consideration was given to sending-in the Marines from one of the offshore ships' detachments.
Those slated to go were leathernecks from the 84-man Marine Detachment aboard the battleship U.S.S. Texas. On the morning of June 7 (D-plus-one), the Texas's Marines began making last minute preparations: Wiping down weapons, distributing grenades, waterproofing field packs, and sharpening K-Bar fighting knives. Others were on the mess decks eating the traditional pre-landing breakfast of steak and eggs: A fact that concerned the Navy's medical corpsmen who feared they would be treating stomach wounds later in the day. Those anxious to go ashore, watched the ongoing action from the ship's railings.
In his book, Spearheading D-Day, Jonathan Gawne writes, "Most of these Marines had no combat experience and had only been in the Corps for a few months [the same could have been said of many of the soldiers who had just landed]. One of them [the Marines] commented: 'This is going to be the biggest slaughter since Custer got his at the Little Big Horn.'"
At the last minute, word was passed down through the Army chain of command that no Marines would be allowed to go ashore, not even riding shotgun on landing craft ferrying Army troops or supplies. Rumors quickly spread that the Army leadership feared a repeat of the media gaffes in 1918. They did not want to see headlines that read, Marines save Rangers at Normandy. Consequently, the Marines were ordered to "stand down."
Though little-known outside of special-operations circles, Marines did however play a few combat roles in the invasion.
Prior-to, during, and after the landings, Marines assigned to the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) — the predecessor to the Central Intelligence Agency — planned and led sabotage and resistance operations with the French underground against the occupying Germans. On D-Day, Marines helped pave the way for British and American pathfinders and paratroopers who dropped behind enemy lines. Additionally, a handful of Marine Corps observers were attached to Army landing forces.
Offshore, Marines were positioned high in the superstructures of American warships in the English Channel. From their lofty perches, the riflemen fired at and detonated floating mines as the ships moved in close to "bombardment stations" along the French coastline. It was reminiscent of the Old Corps during the age of sail when sharp-shooting Marines climbed the masts and riggings and battled enemy crews from the "fighting tops."
Normandy was indeed big, but the war itself was far bigger. There was enough action in both the Atlantic and Pacific theaters for everyone, and everyone got to play. But that failed to stanch the growing interservice rivalry between the Army and Marines.
The day before the invasion of Normandy, a restless Army Lt. Gen. George S. Patton Jr. addressed his troops (the shorter, less-profane version of that address was made famous by actor George C. Scott, who ironically was a former U.S. Marine).
Publicly, Patton was full of fire and an unsated desire to kill the enemy. Privately, he was disappointed. Neither he nor his 1st U.S. Army Group — a skeleton host formed to deceive the Germans into believing that the Americans would land at Pas de Calais — were going to participate in the landings. But unbeknownst to the general, the coming weeks would see Eisenhower bring Patton off the sidelines, give him command of the U.S. Third Army, and then hurl that force against the reconstituted German defenses beyond the Normandy beachhead. In that capacity, Patton was destined to make headlines of his own.
Outlining his colorful albeit controversial vision of the future, Patton said, "The quicker we clean up this g**damned mess, the quicker we can take a little jaunt against the purple pissing Japs and clean out their nest, too. Before the g**damned Marines get all of the credit."
So Interesting if true, and further discussion to validate the presence of Marines in the ETO, whether or not they were used.
Plus also a nice picture of the Armoured ID guy

interesting part about marines detonating mines with gun fire,,,, they must have been olympic gold medal standard marksmen, on 6june 1944 there was an 8 foot swell in the channel.
Yeah, especially as the round is likely to have pancaked as soon as it hit the water. Especially good shot considering the hight of the towers on those destroyers!

maybe thats why all good american assisins are former marines 
Hmmmm. Is that USMC or the camo that was briefly used in ETO?
Another thing is that I'm suspicious of that photograph. Are you sure it's original? The Signal Corp watermark looks a bit 'cropped' and he's a remarkable hefty chap for the 40's. Could it possibly be a reenactor photo?
What's your source Matt?

























http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/sh ... p?t=121309
Yeah I thought the same about the weight of the person, maybe not every1 could have been stick thin. "Big Boned" I think is the term hehe (like me)

I have this in a book from the 50's Its an infantry division using it experimentally though it was ditched quickkly as they were mistaken for germans. Ill try and find the details on it.
I've heard conflicting opinions on whether they did get mistaken for Germans or not.















You've got nothing to ein, zwei, drei, vier
Is that a period drainpipe?
Have we a plumber/ drainage expert in the house? ![]()
Yes the Signal Corp stamp looks very fake to me would it not be black ink not white, and you cannot tell if the image under the stamp matches the photo also the jagged edge on the outer ring looks bad.
Is this better?

Free speech is expensive these days!

Barrie!! ![]()















You've got nothing to ein, zwei, drei, vier
I'll proffer an expert opinion on the 'stamp'...
Looks OK to me - sure it's rough but looks like a very common method that I used to use thirty years ago when sending out proofs. Instead of using an ink stamp on a dry print or and embossing stamp that physically marks the paper you can use a bit of high contrast film that you fix on the corner of the masking frame before exposure under the enlarger. The negative's image is blocked where the overlay is black so you end up with a white 'proof' (Signal Corps here). Where the film is clear then the image shows through of course - you can see the stone in this case.
The chap is rather chunky for the 1940's, however he seems to have a bit of an appetite...

All the Signal Corps stamps I have seen are white:

The HBT camo was used for a short period before being withdrawn. There's only one documented case of blue-on-blue using it apparently. Flibble has posted extensively on this subject elsewhere.
S

























And that's my que ![]()
The picture in question is well known, but the name of the man eludes me at the moment. It is indeed of a GI of the 41st Armored Infantry Regiment attached to the Second Armored Division.
Unlike the USMC camouflage uniform the M1942 Camouflage HBT was meant to be worn over the wool uniform, which explains the man's 'girth'.
The HBTs weren't so much withdrawn as that the quartermasters simply ran out.
"Breakout at Normandy" by Mark Bando makes for an interesting read concerning these uniforms.
As for marines in the ETO...I'd still consider it quite dodgy seeing them on a Normandy shore in USMC uniforms and equipment.

Join Now!
Barrie!!
The drain pipe is discharging very high above the ground which means it's certainly not a particularly modern installation.
EDITED to add, the surround at the end of the pipe leads me to believe it's not plastic, again suggesting it could indeed be authentic. Unless of course it's one of those expensive repro ones from Plumber of Fortune.


Free speech is expensive these days!

Gahh, those damn Plumer of Fortune pipes. Bought a complete set for my Victorian studio. Looked great (once I had repainted them the correct colour
) but they leaked at first rainfall. Bloody monkey metal!

No he isn't: ![]()

























I rekon the unflipped 1 is the right way around, i eat with my left hand but i shoot with my right, his rifle is on his right hand side too, ready to grab on the shooting arm if needs be

I eat with my left hand
I tend to use cutlery when appropriate ![]()


