The Kit Pic Thread
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Kit Pic Thread

3,228 Posts
178 Users
2 Reactions
231.8 K Views
101stairborne-506
(@101stairborne-506)
Posts: 468
Reputable Member
 

erm, yes its VFC and i dont think i will lose any of it.

the carry handle was issued later on in the war, which is the impression im going for.

and the bipod was not post war, it was actually pre war, was developed in 1938-39 and was issued in 1940.

so, i'm keeping it as it is :good:

Now a 'namsofter. I have an M72 L.A.W. for sale for 110 posted, PM if interested.

 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:50 pm
(@anonymous)
Posts: 8795
Illustrious Member
 

jump boots as worn by the rangers ..bloused but in those pics just a little to low...and useing my tankers jacket badged up ..some rangers did use them but 99% had thye m41 witch i am now useing ..i did have before but just went with the tankers in france for a change ...all HBT trousers and jacket ..now have a 1st pat HBT jacket witch i am useing now never isseued when i got it it still had the cutters taggs on from the 40s snip at £45

 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:54 pm
101stairborne-506
(@101stairborne-506)
Posts: 468
Reputable Member
 

did any infantry lines wear these on d-day do you know?

Now a 'namsofter. I have an M72 L.A.W. for sale for 110 posted, PM if interested.

 
Posted : 03/12/2009 10:57 pm
(@anonymous)
Posts: 8795
Illustrious Member
 

nope ..only 82nd ..101st and other airboune units ...the rangers used them as being as good if not better then the airbourne..theres lots of storys of 101st/82nd geting into fights over the boots

 
Posted : 03/12/2009 11:00 pm
(@anonymous)
Posts: 8795
Illustrious Member
 


when i was in the 29th c company //gunpowder mills event ...pre battle chat

 
Posted : 03/12/2009 11:17 pm
Glenlivet45
(@glenlivet45)
Posts: 173
Estimable Member
 

erm, yes its VFC and i dont think i will lose any of it.

the carry handle was issued later on in the war, which is the impression im going for.

and the bipod was not post war, it was actually pre war, was developed in 1938-39 and was issued in 1940.

so, i'm keeping it as it is :good:

I did not mean to offend you. Hey if you are happy with it, fine! :good:
I have the BAR as well and after doing some research i decided to ditch the carry handle for WW2 Impressions (and believe me i wanted
to keep it because it looks nice :lol: ) Do you have a WW2 picture of the carry handle in use? I know none.
About the bipod, yes they were used in WW2, but not the version you have. The "top screw feet" may be OK for a 1945 impression
but the "stamped head" was never used in WW2 as far as i know.

WW2 USMC & Imperial Japanese Army Collecting / Airsoft Blog

 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:32 am
Devonshire Trooper
(@devonshire-trooper)
Posts: 1354
Noble Member
 

later on in the war, which is the impression im going for.

If it's a latewar load then why the M42's? unless your just refering to the BAR and not the whole loadout :wink:

 
Posted : 04/12/2009 12:41 am
101stairborne-506
(@101stairborne-506)
Posts: 468
Reputable Member
 

market garden. alot of guys who were dropped in after the first jump aparently wore whatever they could get thier hands on.

but i was meant to wear my m43's but i can't find them :( think theyre in my dad's van.

and Glenlivet45 sorry, i didnt mean to come accross as rude, i read up on it somewhere but the only place i can find this morning ( only got about 10 minutes so cant spend ages hunting around. )

"In 1938–1939, work was begun on what would become the new M1918A2, accepted into service in 1940. One of the most important aspects of this modification involved removal of the semi-automatic firing capabilities of the weapon and using a rate-reducing buffer mechanism, activated by engaging the "F" position on the selector toggle. Furthermore, a new skid-footed bipod was fitted to the muzzle end of the barrel, magazine guides were added to the front of the trigger guard, the handguard was shortened, a heat shield was added to help the cooling process, a small monopod was hinged from and folded into the butt, and the weapon's role was changed to that of a squad light machine gun. The BAR's rear sight scales were also modified to accommodate the newly-standardized M2 Ball ammunition with its lighter flat-base bullet. In 1942, a fiberglass buttstock replaced the wood version, and late in the war, a barrel-mounted carrying handle was added." wikipedia :oops: :oops: :oops:

isn't my bipod the skid footed one?

and as it says, a barrel-mounted carry handle was added late in the war. guessing around 44/45

if anyone has any further detailed information it would be muchly aprieciated.

Now a 'namsofter. I have an M72 L.A.W. for sale for 110 posted, PM if interested.

 
Posted : 04/12/2009 7:28 am
101stairborne-506
(@101stairborne-506)
Posts: 468
Reputable Member
 

but i've taken it all of now as i prefer my 35th infantry, and obviously for weight ect. none of the 'extras' as you might say were added.

Now a 'namsofter. I have an M72 L.A.W. for sale for 110 posted, PM if interested.

 
Posted : 04/12/2009 7:30 am
Glenlivet45
(@glenlivet45)
Posts: 173
Estimable Member
 

Hi,

Yes you do have a skid footed bipod, but a very late war one at best. As i wrote before the "head" holding the feet
(maybe a better word is legs) is not WW2, the legs maybe OK for WW2 1945. I have a similar problem, i have a correct
WW2 real steel head, but i do not have the bottom screw legs.

I have found absolutely no proof whatsoever of the carry handle in WW2 use. Even though it was designed in late 1944.

There was a really nice website were all of this was explained in detail. But i can not find it anymore... :evil:

WW2 USMC & Imperial Japanese Army Collecting / Airsoft Blog

 
Posted : 04/12/2009 9:27 am
McVickers
(@mcvickers)
Posts: 4652
Famed Member
 

I have found absolutely no proof whatsoever of the carry handle in WW2 use. Even though it was designed in late 1944.

Probably a very similar situation as with the British entrenching tool helve with the bayonet lug on the end. Designed and produced during the war, but never got to be issued to front-line troops as it wasn't important enough/instantly needed.

A Proud Member Of 'Team Spleen!' who play mainly at Gunman Airsoft, Tuddenham, Suffolk.

 
Posted : 04/12/2009 1:26 pm
Helga Geerhart
(@helga-geerhart)
Posts: 4580
Famed Member
 

Can you see Che's common pose for photo ops........


 
Posted : 05/12/2009 10:08 am
(@anonymous)
Posts: 8795
Illustrious Member
 

mmmm last week me thinks ..LOL

 
Posted : 05/12/2009 6:31 pm
Poacher
(@poacher)
Posts: 2279
Noble Member
 

There is a larger issue with the use of a BAR by paratroopers other than the carry handle and type of Bi-pod. They were never issued to paratroopers. They did not appear on the TO&E for paratroopers.
They were considered un-safe to jump with, the paratroop rifle squad was based on an lmg rather than the BAR of the infantry.

aka Stigroadie

AFRA
better by design

"Truth is a shining goddess, always veiled, always distant, never wholly approachable, but worthy of all the devotion of which the human spirit is capable. "

 
Posted : 05/12/2009 7:35 pm
(@anonymous)
Posts: 8795
Illustrious Member
 

very true

 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:01 pm
101stairborne-506
(@101stairborne-506)
Posts: 468
Reputable Member
 

ok, looks like i will have to stick to my m1 garand with my airborne stuff then :(

i used the BAR with my 35th infantry today without the extras. loving the lightness of not having that bloody bipod!

i may sell the bipod and carry handle and get a few more mags.

Now a 'namsofter. I have an M72 L.A.W. for sale for 110 posted, PM if interested.

 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:10 pm
(@anonymous)
Posts: 8795
Illustrious Member
 

Garrand is the way to go ... :happyclap:

 
Posted : 05/12/2009 8:29 pm
spiers
(@spiers)
Posts: 2127
Noble Member
 

ok, looks like i will have to stick to my m1 garand with my airborne stuff then :(

i used the BAR with my 35th infantry today without the extras. loving the lightness of not having that bloody bipod!

i may sell the bipod and carry handle and get a few more mags.

Hey Tom, don't get ride of them on the account of accuracy of one impression, if you're doing a 35th infantry impression then definately keeps it, in Kelly's Heroes pretty sure there was carry handle and bipod on their BAR (Note: I'm not using Kelly's Heroes as a measuring stick for historical accuracy...howver it is a great film!)

Show me a man who will jump out of an airplane, and I'll show you a man who will fight!
General James M. Gavin

CRY HAVOC AND LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR

 
Posted : 06/12/2009 9:52 am
101stairborne-506
(@101stairborne-506)
Posts: 468
Reputable Member
 

yeah, but i prefer too keep it as accurate as possible, i prefer using it without the bipod and carry handle. :good:

i will probably use the bipod and carry handle for my usmc loadout though :)

Now a 'namsofter. I have an M72 L.A.W. for sale for 110 posted, PM if interested.

 
Posted : 06/12/2009 10:03 am
Onkelmann
(@onkelmann)
Posts: 40
Eminent Member
 

Here's a littlebit Finnish loadout. Rifle isn't Finnish, as you see, but there were very few Mauser rifles in use. Boots are civilian model, wich wasn't so uncommon in Finnish army during war.-- attachment is not available --

 
Posted : 06/12/2009 12:56 pm
Page 79 / 162
Share: