Notifications
Clear all

Fallshy group

51 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
1,305 Views
Chomley-Warner
(@admin-infinity)
Posts: 15632
Illustrious Member Admin
Topic starter
 

Anyhoo, what do you think about Andy's Fallshy request for a group section? It's not possible to say no is it! Or is it?


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 8:46 pm
Gadge
(@gadge)
Posts: 7247
Illustrious Member
 

I think its not a bad idea.

Andy does it,

helgas getting the kit

kermit, snyper and lardass monkey also do FJ among others

its also a *very* good unit to encourage to be able to do some more exciting 'what ifs' as we can do some german airborne secret missions etc.





"I think we are in rats' alley - Where the dead men lost their bones."

 
Posted : 17/12/2007 8:57 pm
Chomley-Warner
(@admin-infinity)
Posts: 15632
Illustrious Member Admin
Topic starter
 

Sure, I'm just getting a bit phased with the 'group' thing. Rhys has taken a lot of my time today!


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 9:00 pm
Kermit
(@kermit)
Posts: 4596
Famed Member
 

Aye, and thats no surprise. He just doesnt seem to get the simple fact that he should have just said "this is what is going to happen"

Anyway, back on topic, i reckon its worthwhile.


When we were a Kingdom it was run by a King
When we were an Empire it was run by an Empress
Now we're a country we're run by a..........

 
Posted : 17/12/2007 9:04 pm
Old Un
(@old-un)
Posts: 6781
Illustrious Member
 

I reckon they ought to form a team (ie do something together) and then ask for a forum ....otherwise we'll have lil forums for everyone who fancies setting up a "team". after all the bollox with SH over this weekend I'm rapidly failing to see the benefit


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 11:22 pm
Old Un
(@old-un)
Posts: 6781
Illustrious Member
 

Just re-read earlier thread ...it's Major isn't it ?:lol:

Hard to say no , although would suggest say yes if he can get 10 people to sign up to it !

I feel we're just slicing a small onion even thinner at the mo .


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 11:32 pm
 Yith
(@yith)
Posts: 11230
Illustrious Member
 

Agreed...

I would have thought it was better to have an all-embracing German group that does all of the different arms like PBI does for the Brits...


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 11:34 pm
Old Un
(@old-un)
Posts: 6781
Illustrious Member
 

Agreed...

I would have thought it was better to have an all-embracing German group that does all of the different arms like PBI does for the Brits...

Yep , I think the same .....otherwise it'll be SS, Heer , Falshy ....Ladies group....toilet cleaning crew...officers only :roll:


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 11:36 pm
Gadge
(@gadge)
Posts: 7247
Illustrious Member
 

I think Rich has a very good point there really.

Maybe worth suggesting tactfully to the germans to have a generic german group wiht a section of ss, heer, fj and a single panzer crew.

More realistic than platoons of each and gives new players somewhee to go if they are looking for a 'team'





"I think we are in rats' alley - Where the dead men lost their bones."

 
Posted : 18/12/2007 6:01 am
HeadShot
(@headshot)
Posts: 9991
Illustrious Member
 

Yep, agreed. Yanks, Brits, Krauts, Ruskies.

Four groups, then people can pick and choose as they wish.

If Rhys does decide to let the Doughboys drop, then I'm going to wade in, rebrand the fucker and just say how it's going to be. No restrictions, no badging, just a group for Americans with the aim of getting it all together for TEHL so that people can just know one-another and fight together on the day.

S




 
Posted : 18/12/2007 11:25 am
Kermit
(@kermit)
Posts: 4596
Famed Member
 

Conversley, given the numbers of players who portray the "dark side", why should they all be lumped in together?

If thats the case, then the I suggest that we dump all the Allies into one section as well. Hell, there are more people with Falschy loadouts alone than Russians, and a damn sight more SS than there are Brits.

So that would make the headings "Axis" and "Allies".


When we were a Kingdom it was run by a King
When we were an Empire it was run by an Empress
Now we're a country we're run by a..........

 
Posted : 18/12/2007 11:31 am
Gadge
(@gadge)
Posts: 7247
Illustrious Member
 

Although were actually geting things *done* in the brit contingent, the point about splitting off from the US was to encourage the fact their were no brits at the time.

I think the key here is that US and US airborne in particular tends to attract pleeyrs who are not really that interested in being in teams, i have to no idea whty though.





"I think we are in rats' alley - Where the dead men lost their bones."

 
Posted : 18/12/2007 11:33 am
Kermit
(@kermit)
Posts: 4596
Famed Member
 

Two phrases:

"Saving Private Ryan" and "Band of Brothers". A lot of 'em just want to dress up in the kit, and not actually do much with it.


When we were a Kingdom it was run by a King
When we were an Empire it was run by an Empress
Now we're a country we're run by a..........

 
Posted : 18/12/2007 11:35 am
HeadShot
(@headshot)
Posts: 9991
Illustrious Member
 

Yep, that's a big part of it. People who want to be film stars rather than actually get their kit dirty.

Speirs rocking up in Yank kit just to show off at Arnhem is a perfect example.

S




 
Posted : 18/12/2007 11:42 am
Gadge
(@gadge)
Posts: 7247
Illustrious Member
 

I think you've hit the nail on the head there.

If i ran a US group i'd call it 'band of brothers', do two loadouts 101st as primary with an option of 29th inf/rangers.

zero fucking about.

If you dont want to do it, dont play in the group, prob for the best as odds are your not a team player anyway if you cant sacrifice a fucking badge to be part of a squad what hope have you of contributing to a game plan that might require you to play a backseat?

Par tof me feels average age is a factor too.

US seems to attrace mid twenties.

Axis mid 30s+

Brits 30s.

could be cos of the cost of kit, US kit is quite cheap, german kit is getting there, brit kit is still costly.





"I think we are in rats' alley - Where the dead men lost their bones."

 
Posted : 18/12/2007 11:42 am
Old Un
(@old-un)
Posts: 6781
Illustrious Member
 

In agreement with all the above so far .


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:08 pm
HeadShot
(@headshot)
Posts: 9991
Illustrious Member
 

Right, Rhys has just PMd me to say he and Webby are going to run it by fiat and he's 99% sure it's going to go ahead with TEHL as a good aim-for point by my suggestion.

FFS! :)




 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:08 pm
Old Un
(@old-un)
Posts: 6781
Illustrious Member
 

*loosing will to live *

BTW after all the crap with SH pre this event , he didn't really do anything with the SS lads other than tart about for photos . Not sure how effective Webby was either , got the feeling Josh steamrollered over him - is this fair or did I hear wrong ?

Let em fight it out , I'm pooped to get further involved with team's :ghey-fight:


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:12 pm
HeadShot
(@headshot)
Posts: 9991
Illustrious Member
 

Me too now. I'm happy to take it up if no-one else is willing but would rather see it come from them.

I don't like Josh, I just think he's a bit of a knob. Not sure how effective he is as a leader, but I just think he's a bit........over-excitable.....




 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:20 pm
 Yith
(@yith)
Posts: 11230
Illustrious Member
 

yup... Webby was completely steamrollered by Josh.

This is probably why we didn't win...

But then Webby didn't exactly do much as far as team leadership went even before Josh took over... He didn't hand me a map until late in the game and never told me what to do once. Josh told me what to do a few times though.

Josh seemed like a nice guy, enthusiastic, but yes over-excitable definitely sums it up.

In general I left the Yanks to their power struggle and did my own thing unless asked...

Mind you Josh did order us to charge down the centre of the initial attack... suffice to say as we were supposed to be commandos I thought this was bollocks and did my own thing.... :)


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:27 pm
Page 1 / 3
Share: